Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
NCLAT dismissed the applicant's application for condonation of a 91-day delay in refiling the appeal. The Tribunal held that the applicant failed to plead any sufficient or reasonable cause-offering only vague allegations of logistical constraints and denial of deliberate delay-and thus did not meet the obligation to aver facts justifying the delay. While acknowledging that condonation in CIRP-related refilings may attract a more liberal approach given Section 12 timelines and the policy of timely resolution, NCLAT found no basis to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant. The condonation application is therefore rejected and the delay is not condoned.
NCLAT dismissed the applicant's application for condonation of a 91-day delay in refiling the appeal. The Tribunal held that the applicant failed to plead any sufficient or reasonable cause-offering only vague allegations of logistical constraints and denial of deliberate delay-and thus did not meet the obligation to aver facts justifying the delay. While acknowledging that condonation in CIRP-related refilings may attract a more liberal approach given Section 12 timelines and the policy of timely resolution, NCLAT found no basis to exercise discretion in favour of the applicant. The condonation application is therefore rejected and the delay is not condoned.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.