Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the impugned order-in-original dated 28.02.2025 passed by Respondent No.2, concluding that the petitioner unlawfully availed ITC on invoices without receipt of goods/services and that part payments of tax, penalty and interest had been made between 23.11.2021 and 06.01.2024. The court held the DGGI investigation did not constitute commencement of proceedings and emphasized the petitioner's duty to contest the show-cause notice issued under Section 73 before the assessing authority; failure to do so precluded relief. The DGGI's limited conclusion on certain suppliers was without prejudice to further action by jurisdictional officers. Petitioner granted liberty to pursue statutory appellate remedies.
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld the impugned order-in-original dated 28.02.2025 passed by Respondent No.2, concluding that the petitioner unlawfully availed ITC on invoices without receipt of goods/services and that part payments of tax, penalty and interest had been made between 23.11.2021 and 06.01.2024. The court held the DGGI investigation did not constitute commencement of proceedings and emphasized the petitioner's duty to contest the show-cause notice issued under Section 73 before the assessing authority; failure to do so precluded relief. The DGGI's limited conclusion on certain suppliers was without prejudice to further action by jurisdictional officers. Petitioner granted liberty to pursue statutory appellate remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
