Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AAR held that interactive flat panel displays (IFPDs) are primarily output/display devices with integrated touch and collaborative software and are not classifiable as automatic data processing (ADP) machines. It affirmed that the technical specifications issued by the Ministry and CBIC circularizing distinctions between IFPDs and conventional monitors are illustrative, not exhaustive, for tariff purposes. Consequently, the various anonymized models at issue qualify under tariff heading 85285900 rather than ADP headings, and attract GST at 28%. The Authority noted prior notification adjustments removing IGCR conditions for non-IFPD monitors and confirmed that classification depends on intended core functionality, not ancillary computing features.
The AAR held that interactive flat panel displays (IFPDs) are primarily output/display devices with integrated touch and collaborative software and are not classifiable as automatic data processing (ADP) machines. It affirmed that the technical specifications issued by the Ministry and CBIC circularizing distinctions between IFPDs and conventional monitors are illustrative, not exhaustive, for tariff purposes. Consequently, the various anonymized models at issue qualify under tariff heading 85285900 rather than ADP headings, and attract GST at 28%. The Authority noted prior notification adjustments removing IGCR conditions for non-IFPD monitors and confirmed that classification depends on intended core functionality, not ancillary computing features.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.