Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
The AAR refused admission of the applicant's advance ruling petition, holding the issue-classification of imported goods for customs duty and import IGST-is outside the statutory ambit of advance rulings under Section 95(a) of the CGST Act and thus non-justiciable before the State AAR. The Authority determined that it has jurisdiction only over GST consequences of outward supplies effected or proposed by the applicant, not inward supplies or customs assessment. The AAR directed that the Customs Authority for Advance Ruling is the appropriate forum to decide HSN classification at import and noted that the importer should seek redress before that authority if dissatisfied with the Bill of Entry classification.
The AAR refused admission of the applicant's advance ruling petition, holding the issue-classification of imported goods for customs duty and import IGST-is outside the statutory ambit of advance rulings under Section 95(a) of the CGST Act and thus non-justiciable before the State AAR. The Authority determined that it has jurisdiction only over GST consequences of outward supplies effected or proposed by the applicant, not inward supplies or customs assessment. The AAR directed that the Customs Authority for Advance Ruling is the appropriate forum to decide HSN classification at import and noted that the importer should seek redress before that authority if dissatisfied with the Bill of Entry classification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
