Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed the petition and upheld the reopening of assessment. The court held that s.149(1)(b) is a jurisdictional fact to be established before reopening for escaped income, and the impugned order rested on a reasonable belief formed after a s.133A survey. The petitioner may adduce ledger entries and material in the pending inquiry; disputed questions of fact (including whether Rs.1,50,50,000 related to advances or AY 2020-21 expenditure) preclude relief under extraordinary writ jurisdiction. The HC found pre-conditions under s.148A(b) satisfied and no jurisdictional error in the exercise under s.148A(d). Article 226 cannot correct intra-jurisdictional errors of law/fact; petition dismissed.
HC dismissed the petition and upheld the reopening of assessment. The court held that s.149(1)(b) is a jurisdictional fact to be established before reopening for escaped income, and the impugned order rested on a reasonable belief formed after a s.133A survey. The petitioner may adduce ledger entries and material in the pending inquiry; disputed questions of fact (including whether Rs.1,50,50,000 related to advances or AY 2020-21 expenditure) preclude relief under extraordinary writ jurisdiction. The HC found pre-conditions under s.148A(b) satisfied and no jurisdictional error in the exercise under s.148A(d). Article 226 cannot correct intra-jurisdictional errors of law/fact; petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
