Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the first ground in favor of the revenue pursuant to the assessee's concession and the revenue's non-objection, resulting in the appellate tribunal upholding the TP adjustment for notional interest on outstanding receivables from an associated enterprise without adjudicating the substantive merits. Conversely, the ITAT set aside the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, restoring the Commissioner (Appeals) order in favour of the assessee on the basis that no exempt income was earned and therefore no s.14A disallowance was warranted, following precedential treatment of the assessee's earlier assessment year.
The ITAT allowed the first ground in favor of the revenue pursuant to the assessee's concession and the revenue's non-objection, resulting in the appellate tribunal upholding the TP adjustment for notional interest on outstanding receivables from an associated enterprise without adjudicating the substantive merits. Conversely, the ITAT set aside the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, restoring the Commissioner (Appeals) order in favour of the assessee on the basis that no exempt income was earned and therefore no s.14A disallowance was warranted, following precedential treatment of the assessee's earlier assessment year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.