Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that for a company the substantial interest test under section 2(22)(e) is to be determined with reference to shareholding at the end of the previous year, not at any time during the year. The Tribunal found undisputed facts showing the assessee's shareholding fell from 22.06% on 30.04.2012 to 8.73% as at year-end relevant to AY 2013-14. Explanation 3(b) is confined to concerns other than companies and does not permit testing "at any time" for companies. Accordingly, the advance from the company to the assessee could not be characterised as a deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e), and the assessment addition was deleted.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that for a company the substantial interest test under section 2(22)(e) is to be determined with reference to shareholding at the end of the previous year, not at any time during the year. The Tribunal found undisputed facts showing the assessee's shareholding fell from 22.06% on 30.04.2012 to 8.73% as at year-end relevant to AY 2013-14. Explanation 3(b) is confined to concerns other than companies and does not permit testing "at any time" for companies. Accordingly, the advance from the company to the assessee could not be characterised as a deemed dividend under section 2(22)(e), and the assessment addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.