Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT quashed notice issued u/s. 148 as invalid and allowed the appeal of the assessee. Relying on the Supreme Court's exposition that the pre-conditions in s.151 are mandatory, the Tribunal held that grant of sanction by an appropriate authority is a jurisdictional prerequisite for the AO to assume jurisdiction and issue a s.148 notice. The impugned s.148A(d) order and final notice dated 06/04/2022 were issued with purported prior sanction by the PCIT, who lacked authority to grant such sanction; statutory sanction was required to be by the Pr. CCIT or the CIT. For this defect alone, the notice was held void and quashed.
ITAT quashed notice issued u/s. 148 as invalid and allowed the appeal of the assessee. Relying on the Supreme Court's exposition that the pre-conditions in s.151 are mandatory, the Tribunal held that grant of sanction by an appropriate authority is a jurisdictional prerequisite for the AO to assume jurisdiction and issue a s.148 notice. The impugned s.148A(d) order and final notice dated 06/04/2022 were issued with purported prior sanction by the PCIT, who lacked authority to grant such sanction; statutory sanction was required to be by the Pr. CCIT or the CIT. For this defect alone, the notice was held void and quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.