Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT quashed notice issued u/s. 148 as invalid and allowed the appeal of the assessee. Relying on the Supreme Court's exposition that the pre-conditions in s.151 are mandatory, the Tribunal held that grant of sanction by an appropriate authority is a jurisdictional prerequisite for the AO to assume jurisdiction and issue a s.148 notice. The impugned s.148A(d) order and final notice dated 06/04/2022 were issued with purported prior sanction by the PCIT, who lacked authority to grant such sanction; statutory sanction was required to be by the Pr. CCIT or the CIT. For this defect alone, the notice was held void and quashed.
ITAT quashed notice issued u/s. 148 as invalid and allowed the appeal of the assessee. Relying on the Supreme Court's exposition that the pre-conditions in s.151 are mandatory, the Tribunal held that grant of sanction by an appropriate authority is a jurisdictional prerequisite for the AO to assume jurisdiction and issue a s.148 notice. The impugned s.148A(d) order and final notice dated 06/04/2022 were issued with purported prior sanction by the PCIT, who lacked authority to grant such sanction; statutory sanction was required to be by the Pr. CCIT or the CIT. For this defect alone, the notice was held void and quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.