Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The SC dismissed the appeals, holding that the appellants are not entitled to deemed export benefits under Para 8.3 of the FTP. The Court held the Press Release did not constitute "law" under the PPA and, in any event, the relevant Notifications alone could not confer entitlement because the appellants failed to satisfy mandatory prerequisites-notably the ICB requirement for supply of goods at the IPP or EPC stage-and procured components through related entities. The DGFT circulars were characterized as clarificatory and, even if treated as Change in Law, would not confer benefits where preconditions were unmet. No restitutionary relief or compensation was awarded; the APTEL judgment dated 04.07.2017 was affirmed.
The SC dismissed the appeals, holding that the appellants are not entitled to deemed export benefits under Para 8.3 of the FTP. The Court held the Press Release did not constitute "law" under the PPA and, in any event, the relevant Notifications alone could not confer entitlement because the appellants failed to satisfy mandatory prerequisites-notably the ICB requirement for supply of goods at the IPP or EPC stage-and procured components through related entities. The DGFT circulars were characterized as clarificatory and, even if treated as Change in Law, would not confer benefits where preconditions were unmet. No restitutionary relief or compensation was awarded; the APTEL judgment dated 04.07.2017 was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
