Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Board finds that the Respondent engaged in prima facie manipulative and fraudulent trading on index expiry days, contravening section 12A(a),(b),(c) of the SEBI Act and regs 3(a)-(d), 4(1), 4(2)(a) and (e) of the PFUTP Regs, 2003. By disproportionately influencing constituent cash and futures markets to benefit concurrent index option positions, the Respondent effected intra-day index manipulation and "extended marking the close." The Board, exercising interim ex-parte powers, directed joint-and-several impoundment of unlawful gains of INR 4,843,57,70,168 in escrow, prohibited market access and dealing in securities, restrained debits/asset transfers subject to SEBI permission, required inventory disclosure within 15 days, permitted limited close-out of open derivative positions within three months, and mandated ongoing exchange surveillance; respondents have 21 days to file objections.
The Board finds that the Respondent engaged in prima facie manipulative and fraudulent trading on index expiry days, contravening section 12A(a),(b),(c) of the SEBI Act and regs 3(a)-(d), 4(1), 4(2)(a) and (e) of the PFUTP Regs, 2003. By disproportionately influencing constituent cash and futures markets to benefit concurrent index option positions, the Respondent effected intra-day index manipulation and "extended marking the close." The Board, exercising interim ex-parte powers, directed joint-and-several impoundment of unlawful gains of INR 4,843,57,70,168 in escrow, prohibited market access and dealing in securities, restrained debits/asset transfers subject to SEBI permission, required inventory disclosure within 15 days, permitted limited close-out of open derivative positions within three months, and mandated ongoing exchange surveillance; respondents have 21 days to file objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.