Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the appeals and upheld approval of the resolution plan, finding no infirmity in the valuation process under Regulation 35. The panel held the third registered valuer's report to be admissible and not perverse, noting that certain units transferred to contractors were correctly excluded from the corporate debtor's asset base. The CoC's commercial wisdom in approving the plan was not interfered with. The dissenting financial creditor remains entitled to payment under section 30(2)(b), the quantum of which is to be determined using the liquidation value derived by averaging the two proximate valuation estimates (first and third valuer reports).
NCLAT dismissed the appeals and upheld approval of the resolution plan, finding no infirmity in the valuation process under Regulation 35. The panel held the third registered valuer's report to be admissible and not perverse, noting that certain units transferred to contractors were correctly excluded from the corporate debtor's asset base. The CoC's commercial wisdom in approving the plan was not interfered with. The dissenting financial creditor remains entitled to payment under section 30(2)(b), the quantum of which is to be determined using the liquidation value derived by averaging the two proximate valuation estimates (first and third valuer reports).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
