Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the petition, holding that principles of natural justice were violated by uploading the show-cause notice on the GST portal without physically serving the Petitioner and without affording a hearing. The Court found the petitioner's explanation for a 288-day delay in filing the appeal to be bona fide and, accordingly, set aside the impugned order dated 28.03.2025 passed by Respondent 1 and condoned the 288-day delay. Conditionally permitting the appeal to proceed, the HC directed the Petitioner to remit an additional deposit of 5% of the disputed tax demand, over and above the 10% statutory deposit (as agreed), to Respondent 2 within four weeks of receipt of the order. Petition disposed.
The HC allowed the petition, holding that principles of natural justice were violated by uploading the show-cause notice on the GST portal without physically serving the Petitioner and without affording a hearing. The Court found the petitioner's explanation for a 288-day delay in filing the appeal to be bona fide and, accordingly, set aside the impugned order dated 28.03.2025 passed by Respondent 1 and condoned the 288-day delay. Conditionally permitting the appeal to proceed, the HC directed the Petitioner to remit an additional deposit of 5% of the disputed tax demand, over and above the 10% statutory deposit (as agreed), to Respondent 2 within four weeks of receipt of the order. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
