Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that commission payments made by the assessee to Bangladesh-based non-resident agents for services rendered wholly outside India did not accrue or arise in India and therefore were not taxable in India; accordingly, the assessee was not obliged to deduct tax at source under s.195. The Tribunal accepted treaty relief under s.90(2) insofar as the recipients were non-resident and their income was not taxable in India. The payments were also held not to constitute royalty or fees for technical services; inspection/checking activities carried out using software/technology were not transformable into royalty/FTS. Decision pronounced in favour of the assessee.
ITAT held that commission payments made by the assessee to Bangladesh-based non-resident agents for services rendered wholly outside India did not accrue or arise in India and therefore were not taxable in India; accordingly, the assessee was not obliged to deduct tax at source under s.195. The Tribunal accepted treaty relief under s.90(2) insofar as the recipients were non-resident and their income was not taxable in India. The payments were also held not to constitute royalty or fees for technical services; inspection/checking activities carried out using software/technology were not transformable into royalty/FTS. Decision pronounced in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.