Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the taxpayer's benchmarking of interest on FCCDs payable to its AEs by applying the domestic PLR was justified; the matter is governed by the Special Bench decision favoring PLR over LIBOR, and the AO/TPO is directed to recompute the ALP accordingly. The Tribunal further held that rental receipts and allied service income from letting of commercial property constitute profits and gains of business or profession (not income from house property) where the taxpayer's activities align with letting as the main object, and directed recomputation of income under that head. Finally, the ITAT denied deduction under s.80IAB, finding the taxpayer was not a "developer" and therefore ineligible for s.80IAB relief (ground dismissed).
The ITAT held that the taxpayer's benchmarking of interest on FCCDs payable to its AEs by applying the domestic PLR was justified; the matter is governed by the Special Bench decision favoring PLR over LIBOR, and the AO/TPO is directed to recompute the ALP accordingly. The Tribunal further held that rental receipts and allied service income from letting of commercial property constitute profits and gains of business or profession (not income from house property) where the taxpayer's activities align with letting as the main object, and directed recomputation of income under that head. Finally, the ITAT denied deduction under s.80IAB, finding the taxpayer was not a "developer" and therefore ineligible for s.80IAB relief (ground dismissed).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.