Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration for noncompliance with Rule 10A CGST Rules and for lack of a reasoned order under Section 29(2), holding that retrospective revocation requires a show-cause notice contemplating such effect and a reasoned application of mind. The court directed that the cancellation shall be effective only from the date of issuance of the SCN, namely 6 August 2024, while permitting the revenue to initiate further proceedings if it intends to pursue retrospective cancellation in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of.
The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration for noncompliance with Rule 10A CGST Rules and for lack of a reasoned order under Section 29(2), holding that retrospective revocation requires a show-cause notice contemplating such effect and a reasoned application of mind. The court directed that the cancellation shall be effective only from the date of issuance of the SCN, namely 6 August 2024, while permitting the revenue to initiate further proceedings if it intends to pursue retrospective cancellation in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.