Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration for noncompliance with Rule 10A CGST Rules and for lack of a reasoned order under Section 29(2), holding that retrospective revocation requires a show-cause notice contemplating such effect and a reasoned application of mind. The court directed that the cancellation shall be effective only from the date of issuance of the SCN, namely 6 August 2024, while permitting the revenue to initiate further proceedings if it intends to pursue retrospective cancellation in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of.
The HC set aside the retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration for noncompliance with Rule 10A CGST Rules and for lack of a reasoned order under Section 29(2), holding that retrospective revocation requires a show-cause notice contemplating such effect and a reasoned application of mind. The court directed that the cancellation shall be effective only from the date of issuance of the SCN, namely 6 August 2024, while permitting the revenue to initiate further proceedings if it intends to pursue retrospective cancellation in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
