Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of unutilized input tax credit for zero-rated exports, holding the rejection unsustainable where shipping bills dated from 13 Sept 2021 and customs records corroborated export transactions despite the LUT being filed on 26 Aug 2021. The court directed the respondent to process and credit the petitioner's refund with statutory interest within two weeks, and further ordered that if the refund is not credited by 3 Sept 2025, interest at 12% per annum shall be payable to the petitioner. Petition allowed; impugned order dated 14 Nov 2024 quashed.
The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of unutilized input tax credit for zero-rated exports, holding the rejection unsustainable where shipping bills dated from 13 Sept 2021 and customs records corroborated export transactions despite the LUT being filed on 26 Aug 2021. The court directed the respondent to process and credit the petitioner's refund with statutory interest within two weeks, and further ordered that if the refund is not credited by 3 Sept 2025, interest at 12% per annum shall be payable to the petitioner. Petition allowed; impugned order dated 14 Nov 2024 quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.