Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of unutilized input tax credit for zero-rated exports, holding the rejection unsustainable where shipping bills dated from 13 Sept 2021 and customs records corroborated export transactions despite the LUT being filed on 26 Aug 2021. The court directed the respondent to process and credit the petitioner's refund with statutory interest within two weeks, and further ordered that if the refund is not credited by 3 Sept 2025, interest at 12% per annum shall be payable to the petitioner. Petition allowed; impugned order dated 14 Nov 2024 quashed.
The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of unutilized input tax credit for zero-rated exports, holding the rejection unsustainable where shipping bills dated from 13 Sept 2021 and customs records corroborated export transactions despite the LUT being filed on 26 Aug 2021. The court directed the respondent to process and credit the petitioner's refund with statutory interest within two weeks, and further ordered that if the refund is not credited by 3 Sept 2025, interest at 12% per annum shall be payable to the petitioner. Petition allowed; impugned order dated 14 Nov 2024 quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
