Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of unutilized input tax credit for zero-rated exports, holding the rejection unsustainable where shipping bills dated from 13 Sept 2021 and customs records corroborated export transactions despite the LUT being filed on 26 Aug 2021. The court directed the respondent to process and credit the petitioner's refund with statutory interest within two weeks, and further ordered that if the refund is not credited by 3 Sept 2025, interest at 12% per annum shall be payable to the petitioner. Petition allowed; impugned order dated 14 Nov 2024 quashed.
The HC set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of unutilized input tax credit for zero-rated exports, holding the rejection unsustainable where shipping bills dated from 13 Sept 2021 and customs records corroborated export transactions despite the LUT being filed on 26 Aug 2021. The court directed the respondent to process and credit the petitioner's refund with statutory interest within two weeks, and further ordered that if the refund is not credited by 3 Sept 2025, interest at 12% per annum shall be payable to the petitioner. Petition allowed; impugned order dated 14 Nov 2024 quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
