Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed the appeal and affirmed ITAT's decision that the gain on the vintage motorcar is taxable as capital gains because the car did not qualify as a "personal effect." The Court held that under the statutory definition of capital asset personal effects are excluded only if an intimate connection with personal or household use is established; mere capability or ownership of a car does not suffice. The Assessee failed to adduce evidence of personal use and relied on irrelevant factors considered by CIT(A). Material indicators (use of employer's car, absence of occasional use, non-parking at residence, no maintenance expenditure) supported ITAT's factual finding, and the substantial question of law was answered against the Assessee.
HC dismissed the appeal and affirmed ITAT's decision that the gain on the vintage motorcar is taxable as capital gains because the car did not qualify as a "personal effect." The Court held that under the statutory definition of capital asset personal effects are excluded only if an intimate connection with personal or household use is established; mere capability or ownership of a car does not suffice. The Assessee failed to adduce evidence of personal use and relied on irrelevant factors considered by CIT(A). Material indicators (use of employer's car, absence of occasional use, non-parking at residence, no maintenance expenditure) supported ITAT's factual finding, and the substantial question of law was answered against the Assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
