Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Held that receipts for the "use" or "right to use" of satellite transponders for provision of telecommunication or satellite services do not constitute "royalty." The AAR's prior determination in favour of the assessee-that payments for use of the monitoring system were not royalty-stands and was unsuccessfully challenged before the apex court. The questions posed by the Revenue do not raise any substantial question of law requiring this HC's adjudication. Further, the domestic amendment to the Income Tax Act by the Finance Act, 2012 cannot broaden the definition of "royalty" in the applicable DTAA; consequently those contentions fail and the appeals are dismissed.
Held that receipts for the "use" or "right to use" of satellite transponders for provision of telecommunication or satellite services do not constitute "royalty." The AAR's prior determination in favour of the assessee-that payments for use of the monitoring system were not royalty-stands and was unsuccessfully challenged before the apex court. The questions posed by the Revenue do not raise any substantial question of law requiring this HC's adjudication. Further, the domestic amendment to the Income Tax Act by the Finance Act, 2012 cannot broaden the definition of "royalty" in the applicable DTAA; consequently those contentions fail and the appeals are dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.