Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and set aside the addition relating to disallowance of claim for IGST refund arising from advance IGST paid on export of services, holding that such advance payment is refundable and does not constitute deductible expenditure or income of the year under s.143(1)(a) intimation. The Tribunal found CIT(A)'s view that non-claim of IGST as expenditure was an attempt to evade s.43B misplaced, noting there is no liability to bear GST/IGST on export of services and the statutory regime mandates advance deposit refundable on proof of export. AO was directed to delete the addition; decision in favour of the assessee.
ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee and set aside the addition relating to disallowance of claim for IGST refund arising from advance IGST paid on export of services, holding that such advance payment is refundable and does not constitute deductible expenditure or income of the year under s.143(1)(a) intimation. The Tribunal found CIT(A)'s view that non-claim of IGST as expenditure was an attempt to evade s.43B misplaced, noting there is no liability to bear GST/IGST on export of services and the statutory regime mandates advance deposit refundable on proof of export. AO was directed to delete the addition; decision in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.