Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that receipts by the taxpayer from a third party for live telecast services do not constitute "royalty" under section 9(1)(vi) and therefore are not taxable in India as royalty income. Applying the relevant precedent, the Tribunal concluded that the payment related to transmission/telecast services and did not transfer proprietary rights or constitute consideration for use of intellectual property in the manner contemplated by the royalty provision. Consequently, the grievance challenging taxation of the live-telecast receipts as royalty is allowed, and the impugned assessment adjustment treating those receipts as taxable royalty income is set aside.
The ITAT held that receipts by the taxpayer from a third party for live telecast services do not constitute "royalty" under section 9(1)(vi) and therefore are not taxable in India as royalty income. Applying the relevant precedent, the Tribunal concluded that the payment related to transmission/telecast services and did not transfer proprietary rights or constitute consideration for use of intellectual property in the manner contemplated by the royalty provision. Consequently, the grievance challenging taxation of the live-telecast receipts as royalty is allowed, and the impugned assessment adjustment treating those receipts as taxable royalty income is set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.