Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed admission of additional documentary evidence concerning intra-group services and interest on outstanding receivables, finding the materials go to the root of the controversy and require examination by the AO. The Tribunal declined to remit the matter to the DRP, holding the DRP functus officio after issuing directions under s.144C(5) and not a proper appellate forum for remand. The Tribunal set aside the final assessment and restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication of the transfer pricing adjustment and interest, directing the AO to verify the newly admitted evidence, afford the assessee opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh order in accordance with law. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT allowed admission of additional documentary evidence concerning intra-group services and interest on outstanding receivables, finding the materials go to the root of the controversy and require examination by the AO. The Tribunal declined to remit the matter to the DRP, holding the DRP functus officio after issuing directions under s.144C(5) and not a proper appellate forum for remand. The Tribunal set aside the final assessment and restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication of the transfer pricing adjustment and interest, directing the AO to verify the newly admitted evidence, afford the assessee opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh order in accordance with law. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.