Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed admission of additional documentary evidence concerning intra-group services and interest on outstanding receivables, finding the materials go to the root of the controversy and require examination by the AO. The Tribunal declined to remit the matter to the DRP, holding the DRP functus officio after issuing directions under s.144C(5) and not a proper appellate forum for remand. The Tribunal set aside the final assessment and restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication of the transfer pricing adjustment and interest, directing the AO to verify the newly admitted evidence, afford the assessee opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh order in accordance with law. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT allowed admission of additional documentary evidence concerning intra-group services and interest on outstanding receivables, finding the materials go to the root of the controversy and require examination by the AO. The Tribunal declined to remit the matter to the DRP, holding the DRP functus officio after issuing directions under s.144C(5) and not a proper appellate forum for remand. The Tribunal set aside the final assessment and restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication of the transfer pricing adjustment and interest, directing the AO to verify the newly admitted evidence, afford the assessee opportunity of hearing, and pass a fresh order in accordance with law. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.