Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld that payments to third-party clinical laboratories are pass-through costs and must be excluded from the assessee's cost base when computing operating margin for CSMM services; the assessee's adjusted margin was accepted at 13.71% (versus 10.34% prior). The Tribunal rejected benchmarking by reference to contract R&D companies and sustained deletion of additions based on improper comparables, and affirmed that marketing support services should not be compared with high-end contract R&D providers. Grounds of appeal by the Revenue were dismissed. The assessee's objection to the AO's exercise of jurisdiction under s.143(3) after 14 years was rejected.
The ITAT upheld that payments to third-party clinical laboratories are pass-through costs and must be excluded from the assessee's cost base when computing operating margin for CSMM services; the assessee's adjusted margin was accepted at 13.71% (versus 10.34% prior). The Tribunal rejected benchmarking by reference to contract R&D companies and sustained deletion of additions based on improper comparables, and affirmed that marketing support services should not be compared with high-end contract R&D providers. Grounds of appeal by the Revenue were dismissed. The assessee's objection to the AO's exercise of jurisdiction under s.143(3) after 14 years was rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.