Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the Revenue's appeal, set aside the CIT(A)'s order and upheld the assessing officer's addition of unaccounted receipts to the assessee's income arising from villa sales. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to discharge the primary onus to identify persons from whom unaccounted cash was received or to whom such sums were remitted, and did not furnish affidavits or supporting particulars despite specific calls. CIT(A) was held to have ignored material documentary evidence, failed to exercise co-terminus jurisdiction and merely followed a prior assessment without applying mind to the facts; consequently the AO's disallowance was sustained as valid addition to income.
ITAT allowed the Revenue's appeal, set aside the CIT(A)'s order and upheld the assessing officer's addition of unaccounted receipts to the assessee's income arising from villa sales. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to discharge the primary onus to identify persons from whom unaccounted cash was received or to whom such sums were remitted, and did not furnish affidavits or supporting particulars despite specific calls. CIT(A) was held to have ignored material documentary evidence, failed to exercise co-terminus jurisdiction and merely followed a prior assessment without applying mind to the facts; consequently the AO's disallowance was sustained as valid addition to income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.