Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the Revenue's appeal, set aside the CIT(A)'s order and upheld the assessing officer's addition of unaccounted receipts to the assessee's income arising from villa sales. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to discharge the primary onus to identify persons from whom unaccounted cash was received or to whom such sums were remitted, and did not furnish affidavits or supporting particulars despite specific calls. CIT(A) was held to have ignored material documentary evidence, failed to exercise co-terminus jurisdiction and merely followed a prior assessment without applying mind to the facts; consequently the AO's disallowance was sustained as valid addition to income.
ITAT allowed the Revenue's appeal, set aside the CIT(A)'s order and upheld the assessing officer's addition of unaccounted receipts to the assessee's income arising from villa sales. The Tribunal found the assessee failed to discharge the primary onus to identify persons from whom unaccounted cash was received or to whom such sums were remitted, and did not furnish affidavits or supporting particulars despite specific calls. CIT(A) was held to have ignored material documentary evidence, failed to exercise co-terminus jurisdiction and merely followed a prior assessment without applying mind to the facts; consequently the AO's disallowance was sustained as valid addition to income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.