Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT dismissed the appeal on merits due to the assessee's failure to establish the requisite nexus between borrowed funds and amounts advanced for earning interest income under section 57. The assessee did not furnish the Balance Sheet, which was critical to demonstrate the deployment of funds and the composition of liabilities. However, considering the assessee's reliance on past assessments and the principle of judicial consistency, the ITAT set aside both the CIT(A)'s order and the assessment order on this limited issue. The matter was restored to the AO with directions to provide the assessee a reasonable opportunity to produce cogent evidence and explanations to establish the real nexus between borrowings and advances. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
The ITAT dismissed the appeal on merits due to the assessee's failure to establish the requisite nexus between borrowed funds and amounts advanced for earning interest income under section 57. The assessee did not furnish the Balance Sheet, which was critical to demonstrate the deployment of funds and the composition of liabilities. However, considering the assessee's reliance on past assessments and the principle of judicial consistency, the ITAT set aside both the CIT(A)'s order and the assessment order on this limited issue. The matter was restored to the AO with directions to provide the assessee a reasonable opportunity to produce cogent evidence and explanations to establish the real nexus between borrowings and advances. The appeal was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.