Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The NCLAT dismissed the contempt application filed for alleged disobedience of its order dated 21.10.2024, noting that an appeal against the said order was pending before the Supreme Court. The Tribunal observed that the contempt proceeding was not adjourned pending the Supreme Court's decision and that an extension of time had been granted by the impugned order. Given these circumstances, the contempt application was dismissed without prejudice to the parties' rights to raise their contentions regarding the alleged non-compliance. The dismissal does not preclude the parties from pursuing their claims of disobedience in appropriate proceedings, and the Tribunal clarified that this decision does not affect the ongoing appeal before the Supreme Court.
The NCLAT dismissed the contempt application filed for alleged disobedience of its order dated 21.10.2024, noting that an appeal against the said order was pending before the Supreme Court. The Tribunal observed that the contempt proceeding was not adjourned pending the Supreme Court's decision and that an extension of time had been granted by the impugned order. Given these circumstances, the contempt application was dismissed without prejudice to the parties' rights to raise their contentions regarding the alleged non-compliance. The dismissal does not preclude the parties from pursuing their claims of disobedience in appropriate proceedings, and the Tribunal clarified that this decision does not affect the ongoing appeal before the Supreme Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
