Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT upheld the approval of the resolution plan under Section 30(2) of the IBC, finding no violation of statutory provisions or CIRP Regulations, 2016. The plan adequately addressed the interests of all stakeholders, including secured financial creditors and operational creditors, with a payout significantly exceeding the liquidation value. The Tribunal recognized that the legislative framework does not mandate payments to operational creditors upon liquidation, and no breach of Section 30(2)(b) was established. It declined to interfere with the commercial wisdom of the CoC, as no grounds were shown to contravene the resolution plan's approval. Consequently, the appeal challenging the impugned order was dismissed for lack of merit.
The NCLAT upheld the approval of the resolution plan under Section 30(2) of the IBC, finding no violation of statutory provisions or CIRP Regulations, 2016. The plan adequately addressed the interests of all stakeholders, including secured financial creditors and operational creditors, with a payout significantly exceeding the liquidation value. The Tribunal recognized that the legislative framework does not mandate payments to operational creditors upon liquidation, and no breach of Section 30(2)(b) was established. It declined to interfere with the commercial wisdom of the CoC, as no grounds were shown to contravene the resolution plan's approval. Consequently, the appeal challenging the impugned order was dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
