Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
The Division Bench of the HC upheld the Single Judge's ruling in favor of Respondent No. 3, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging eligibility for budgetary support. The Court found the issue to be settled law and declined to revisit the matter. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the order dated 27-06-2022 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Gangtok Division, was set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Division Bench of the HC upheld the Single Judge's ruling in favor of Respondent No. 3, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging eligibility for budgetary support. The Court found the issue to be settled law and declined to revisit the matter. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the order dated 27-06-2022 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Gangtok Division, was set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
