Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Division Bench of the HC upheld the Single Judge's ruling in favor of Respondent No. 3, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging eligibility for budgetary support. The Court found the issue to be settled law and declined to revisit the matter. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the order dated 27-06-2022 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Gangtok Division, was set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Division Bench of the HC upheld the Single Judge's ruling in favor of Respondent No. 3, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging eligibility for budgetary support. The Court found the issue to be settled law and declined to revisit the matter. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the order dated 27-06-2022 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Gangtok Division, was set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.