Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
The Division Bench of the HC upheld the Single Judge's ruling in favor of Respondent No. 3, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging eligibility for budgetary support. The Court found the issue to be settled law and declined to revisit the matter. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the order dated 27-06-2022 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Gangtok Division, was set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Division Bench of the HC upheld the Single Judge's ruling in favor of Respondent No. 3, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging eligibility for budgetary support. The Court found the issue to be settled law and declined to revisit the matter. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the order dated 27-06-2022 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Gangtok Division, was set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
