Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3101 to 3120 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Division Bench of the HC upheld the Single Judge's ruling in favor of Respondent No. 3, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging eligibility for budgetary support. The Court found the issue to be settled law and declined to revisit the matter. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the order dated 27-06-2022 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Gangtok Division, was set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The Division Bench of the HC upheld the Single Judge's ruling in favor of Respondent No. 3, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging eligibility for budgetary support. The Court found the issue to be settled law and declined to revisit the matter. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the order dated 27-06-2022 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Central GST, Gangtok Division, was set aside. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
