Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal by reducing the disallowance of improvement costs from Rs. 32,98,799 to Rs. 10,00,000. The tribunal accepted the assessee's evidence regarding construction expenses on the capital asset, despite minor discrepancies in the property address. It was held that the expenditure was legitimately incurred on the plot(s) in question, and the department failed to justify the entire disallowance. The relief granted amounted to Rs. 22,98,799, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The order clarified that this decision shall not serve as precedent in other cases.
The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal by reducing the disallowance of improvement costs from Rs. 32,98,799 to Rs. 10,00,000. The tribunal accepted the assessee's evidence regarding construction expenses on the capital asset, despite minor discrepancies in the property address. It was held that the expenditure was legitimately incurred on the plot(s) in question, and the department failed to justify the entire disallowance. The relief granted amounted to Rs. 22,98,799, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The order clarified that this decision shall not serve as precedent in other cases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
