Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal by reducing the disallowance of improvement costs from Rs. 32,98,799 to Rs. 10,00,000. The tribunal accepted the assessee's evidence regarding construction expenses on the capital asset, despite minor discrepancies in the property address. It was held that the expenditure was legitimately incurred on the plot(s) in question, and the department failed to justify the entire disallowance. The relief granted amounted to Rs. 22,98,799, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The order clarified that this decision shall not serve as precedent in other cases.
The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal by reducing the disallowance of improvement costs from Rs. 32,98,799 to Rs. 10,00,000. The tribunal accepted the assessee's evidence regarding construction expenses on the capital asset, despite minor discrepancies in the property address. It was held that the expenditure was legitimately incurred on the plot(s) in question, and the department failed to justify the entire disallowance. The relief granted amounted to Rs. 22,98,799, subject to proper computation in accordance with law. The order clarified that this decision shall not serve as precedent in other cases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.