Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC held that once a sole arbitrator is appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court ceases to have jurisdiction to entertain further applications related to the arbitration proceedings, including prayers for non-signatories to intervene or remain present. The applications by non-signatories seeking such permission were deemed misconceived and an abuse of process, as the Act does not provide for observers or intervention by non-parties in arbitration. The impugned order permitting non-signatories to attend the arbitration was set aside for lacking statutory basis. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, quashed the interim orders, and confirmed that the parties must proceed in accordance with the arbitration order dated 22.03.2024, thereby affirming the finality of the arbitral appointment and precluding further judicial interference.
The SC held that once a sole arbitrator is appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court ceases to have jurisdiction to entertain further applications related to the arbitration proceedings, including prayers for non-signatories to intervene or remain present. The applications by non-signatories seeking such permission were deemed misconceived and an abuse of process, as the Act does not provide for observers or intervention by non-parties in arbitration. The impugned order permitting non-signatories to attend the arbitration was set aside for lacking statutory basis. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal, quashed the interim orders, and confirmed that the parties must proceed in accordance with the arbitration order dated 22.03.2024, thereby affirming the finality of the arbitral appointment and precluding further judicial interference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
