Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the demand raised for fraudulent availment and utilization of inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC). The Court noted that the Petitioner was duly aware of the ongoing investigation and failed to participate in the proceedings, which precludes condonation of such negligence. The contention regarding the delay in passing the impugned order was rejected, as the order was duly signed and dated within the limitation period despite a later upload date. Consequently, the HC upheld the impugned order confirming the demand and declined to interfere, dismissing the petition.
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the demand raised for fraudulent availment and utilization of inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC). The Court noted that the Petitioner was duly aware of the ongoing investigation and failed to participate in the proceedings, which precludes condonation of such negligence. The contention regarding the delay in passing the impugned order was rejected, as the order was duly signed and dated within the limitation period despite a later upload date. Consequently, the HC upheld the impugned order confirming the demand and declined to interfere, dismissing the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
