Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the demand raised for fraudulent availment and utilization of inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC). The Court noted that the Petitioner was duly aware of the ongoing investigation and failed to participate in the proceedings, which precludes condonation of such negligence. The contention regarding the delay in passing the impugned order was rejected, as the order was duly signed and dated within the limitation period despite a later upload date. Consequently, the HC upheld the impugned order confirming the demand and declined to interfere, dismissing the petition.
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the demand raised for fraudulent availment and utilization of inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC). The Court noted that the Petitioner was duly aware of the ongoing investigation and failed to participate in the proceedings, which precludes condonation of such negligence. The contention regarding the delay in passing the impugned order was rejected, as the order was duly signed and dated within the limitation period despite a later upload date. Consequently, the HC upheld the impugned order confirming the demand and declined to interfere, dismissing the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
