Revenue neutrality in domestic related-party loans can require deletion of interest transfer pricing adjustments after domestic-transaction verificati...
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the demand raised for fraudulent availment and utilization of inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC). The Court noted that the Petitioner was duly aware of the ongoing investigation and failed to participate in the proceedings, which precludes condonation of such negligence. The contention regarding the delay in passing the impugned order was rejected, as the order was duly signed and dated within the limitation period despite a later upload date. Consequently, the HC upheld the impugned order confirming the demand and declined to interfere, dismissing the petition.
The HC dismissed the writ petition filed by the Petitioner challenging the demand raised for fraudulent availment and utilization of inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC). The Court noted that the Petitioner was duly aware of the ongoing investigation and failed to participate in the proceedings, which precludes condonation of such negligence. The contention regarding the delay in passing the impugned order was rejected, as the order was duly signed and dated within the limitation period despite a later upload date. Consequently, the HC upheld the impugned order confirming the demand and declined to interfere, dismissing the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
