Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the petitioner's contract falls under category B, not category D, for GST purposes, as it pertains to works sanctioned post 01.07.2017 under PMGSY phases without GST accounted in the original sanction. The respondent authority failed to follow the prescribed procedure under category A, which is applicable to category B cases, including the reverse charge mechanism for GST on running bills paid from 01.07.2017. The Court directed the respondent to strictly adhere to the procedure outlined in the communication dated 06.06.2018 and to refund the 2% GST amount previously deducted from the petitioner. The respondent must complete these steps within three months from receipt of the certified order. The writ petition was allowed accordingly.
The HC held that the petitioner's contract falls under category B, not category D, for GST purposes, as it pertains to works sanctioned post 01.07.2017 under PMGSY phases without GST accounted in the original sanction. The respondent authority failed to follow the prescribed procedure under category A, which is applicable to category B cases, including the reverse charge mechanism for GST on running bills paid from 01.07.2017. The Court directed the respondent to strictly adhere to the procedure outlined in the communication dated 06.06.2018 and to refund the 2% GST amount previously deducted from the petitioner. The respondent must complete these steps within three months from receipt of the certified order. The writ petition was allowed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.