Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The HC held that the impugned order and show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Gujarat GST Act were without jurisdiction and violated principles of natural justice, as no personal hearing was granted before raising the demand. The court found failure to consider the petitioner's reply and absence of opportunity for hearing contravened Section 75(4) of the GST Act. Relying on precedent affirming the necessity of a proper personal hearing, the HC quashed and set aside the original order. The matter was remanded to the respondent authority for issuance of a fresh de novo order after affording the petitioner a valid personal hearing in compliance with statutory requirements. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
The HC held that the impugned order and show cause notice issued under Section 74 of the Gujarat GST Act were without jurisdiction and violated principles of natural justice, as no personal hearing was granted before raising the demand. The court found failure to consider the petitioner's reply and absence of opportunity for hearing contravened Section 75(4) of the GST Act. Relying on precedent affirming the necessity of a proper personal hearing, the HC quashed and set aside the original order. The matter was remanded to the respondent authority for issuance of a fresh de novo order after affording the petitioner a valid personal hearing in compliance with statutory requirements. The petition was allowed by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
