Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT recalled its earlier order regarding the transfer pricing adjustment under section 92BA, acknowledging the omission of clause (i) by the Finance Act, 2017, which rendered the previous reliance on that clause invalid. However, the Tribunal recognized that the transaction involving the transfer of finished goods between non-eligible and eligible units falls within the scope of section 92BA(v). Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the revenue's miscellaneous application to recall its prior order and directed that the main appeal be listed for hearing on 30.09.2025. The decision clarifies that while section 92BA(i) is omitted, adjustments under other clauses of section 92BA remain valid, warranting a fresh consideration of the appeal.
The ITAT recalled its earlier order regarding the transfer pricing adjustment under section 92BA, acknowledging the omission of clause (i) by the Finance Act, 2017, which rendered the previous reliance on that clause invalid. However, the Tribunal recognized that the transaction involving the transfer of finished goods between non-eligible and eligible units falls within the scope of section 92BA(v). Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the revenue's miscellaneous application to recall its prior order and directed that the main appeal be listed for hearing on 30.09.2025. The decision clarifies that while section 92BA(i) is omitted, adjustments under other clauses of section 92BA remain valid, warranting a fresh consideration of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
