Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT upheld the validity of the order passed under section 206C(6A) of the Act, rejecting the claim of unjustified delay since the Revenue became aware of the non-collection of tax only after a survey under section 133A. However, the Tribunal found that the AO had passed the order without issuing any prior notice or opportunity to the assessee, effectively making it ex parte. The CIT(A) erred in dismissing the assessee's plea regarding the excessive basis of TCS calculation solely on procedural grounds. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication, directing that the assessee be given a proper opportunity of hearing to submit evidence and arguments before a fresh order is passed in accordance with law.
The ITAT upheld the validity of the order passed under section 206C(6A) of the Act, rejecting the claim of unjustified delay since the Revenue became aware of the non-collection of tax only after a survey under section 133A. However, the Tribunal found that the AO had passed the order without issuing any prior notice or opportunity to the assessee, effectively making it ex parte. The CIT(A) erred in dismissing the assessee's plea regarding the excessive basis of TCS calculation solely on procedural grounds. Consequently, the matter was remanded to the AO for fresh adjudication, directing that the assessee be given a proper opportunity of hearing to submit evidence and arguments before a fresh order is passed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
