Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC held that DRI officials are "proper officers" under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, a position conclusively settled by the Supreme Court in Canon-II. The challenge to the jurisdiction of DRI officials to issue the Show Cause Notice (SCN) was dismissed. Regarding the absence of pre-SCN consultation as mandated by the Regulations, the Adjudicating Authority provided valid reasons for dispensing with such notice. The Order-in-Original passed during the writ petition's pendency is appealable before the CESTAT under Section 129A of the Customs Act. The petitioner is entitled to raise all grievances, including the pre-notice consultation issue, before the appellate forum. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, affirming the authority of DRI officials and directing the petitioner to seek remedies through the prescribed appellate mechanism.
The HC held that DRI officials are "proper officers" under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, a position conclusively settled by the Supreme Court in Canon-II. The challenge to the jurisdiction of DRI officials to issue the Show Cause Notice (SCN) was dismissed. Regarding the absence of pre-SCN consultation as mandated by the Regulations, the Adjudicating Authority provided valid reasons for dispensing with such notice. The Order-in-Original passed during the writ petition's pendency is appealable before the CESTAT under Section 129A of the Customs Act. The petitioner is entitled to raise all grievances, including the pre-notice consultation issue, before the appellate forum. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, affirming the authority of DRI officials and directing the petitioner to seek remedies through the prescribed appellate mechanism.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.