Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Board found the Noticees, led by Noticee No. 1, guilty of engaging in a manipulative and fraudulent scheme involving unfair trade practices under the SEBI Act, PFUTP Regulations, and RA Regulations. Noticee No. 1 manipulated securities prices by recommending certain stocks through media channels after purchasing them, profiting from subsequent price increases. The Noticees were held jointly and severally liable for unlawful gains totaling approximately Rs. 11.37 crore. An interim ex parte order was passed impounding this amount, directing the Noticees to deposit it in fixed deposit accounts with a lien in favor of SEBI. Noticees Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 12 were restrained from accessing the securities market and prohibited from dealing in securities, while Noticee No. 4 was barred from proprietary trading. Banks and depositories were directed to restrict debits from the Noticees' accounts without SEBI's permission. The Noticees must preserve relevant records and provide a full inventory of their assets pending further orders.
The Board found the Noticees, led by Noticee No. 1, guilty of engaging in a manipulative and fraudulent scheme involving unfair trade practices under the SEBI Act, PFUTP Regulations, and RA Regulations. Noticee No. 1 manipulated securities prices by recommending certain stocks through media channels after purchasing them, profiting from subsequent price increases. The Noticees were held jointly and severally liable for unlawful gains totaling approximately Rs. 11.37 crore. An interim ex parte order was passed impounding this amount, directing the Noticees to deposit it in fixed deposit accounts with a lien in favor of SEBI. Noticees Nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 12 were restrained from accessing the securities market and prohibited from dealing in securities, while Noticee No. 4 was barred from proprietary trading. Banks and depositories were directed to restrict debits from the Noticees' accounts without SEBI's permission. The Noticees must preserve relevant records and provide a full inventory of their assets pending further orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
