Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC granted mandamus directing the first respondent, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, to adhere to the procedural requirements under the 2017 Grievance and Complaint Handling Procedure Regulations in considering the petitioner's complaints. The Board must ensure that the Disciplinary Committee follows the principles of natural justice, issues a reasoned order on any show cause notices, and applies Chapter V provisions on restitution where applicable. The court recognized that the matter involving the third respondent remains at a preliminary stage, prior to determination of a prima facie case for investigation. The Board was ordered to complete the complaint resolution process concerning the first respondent within three months from receipt of the order. The petition was accordingly closed.
The HC granted mandamus directing the first respondent, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, to adhere to the procedural requirements under the 2017 Grievance and Complaint Handling Procedure Regulations in considering the petitioner's complaints. The Board must ensure that the Disciplinary Committee follows the principles of natural justice, issues a reasoned order on any show cause notices, and applies Chapter V provisions on restitution where applicable. The court recognized that the matter involving the third respondent remains at a preliminary stage, prior to determination of a prima facie case for investigation. The Board was ordered to complete the complaint resolution process concerning the first respondent within three months from receipt of the order. The petition was accordingly closed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.