Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT held that an appeal under Section 61 of the IBC is not maintainable against an order passed by the President of the NCLT under Rule 16(d), as such orders are administrative in nature and not adjudicatory orders under Part-II of the IBC. The President's power under Rule 16(d) to transfer cases between Benches is a roster and administrative function, not subject to appeal under Section 61. However, appeals against such orders lie under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT New Delhi Bench's decision to withhold hearing of the main matter pending the outcome of competing transfer applications filed by the parties seeking transfer of proceedings between the Mumbai and Delhi Benches. The appeal challenging this administrative order was dismissed for lack of maintainability and absence of error in the NCLT's approach to await completion of the transfer process.
The NCLAT held that an appeal under Section 61 of the IBC is not maintainable against an order passed by the President of the NCLT under Rule 16(d), as such orders are administrative in nature and not adjudicatory orders under Part-II of the IBC. The President's power under Rule 16(d) to transfer cases between Benches is a roster and administrative function, not subject to appeal under Section 61. However, appeals against such orders lie under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT New Delhi Bench's decision to withhold hearing of the main matter pending the outcome of competing transfer applications filed by the parties seeking transfer of proceedings between the Mumbai and Delhi Benches. The appeal challenging this administrative order was dismissed for lack of maintainability and absence of error in the NCLT's approach to await completion of the transfer process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.